Yes that's always a check point for us Erwin. Thanks Lavanya
On Fri, Dec 21, 2018, 14:45 Erwin Olario <[email protected] wrote: > > And speaking of imagery alignment, please check the imagery offsets > database, if you're working with any imagery (even Bing), our (Kaart) work > in PH updates the IODB, whenever possible, and recording offsets with > Strava heatmaps (or some other source.) > > On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 3:32 PM Eugene Alvin Villar <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 3:25 PM Glen Scott <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Is it a concern that they keep referring to Bing imagery "We will also >>> use Bing imagery to ensure there are no missing roads". In the parts >>> I've looked at, some roads on Bing just don't exist any more! Bing is good >>> for coastline where there has been no human development, but not good for >>> anything else. Using Bing imagery to check for roads will create the >>> classic GPS nav problem - OLD DATA = WRONG WAY! >>> >> >> It is definitely a concern to use any old and outdated imagery, not just >> Bing. But based on experience, Bing usually has the best alignment out of >> all the available satellite imagery so it makes sense to refer to Bing (at >> first). But any good remote mapper worth their salt should check other >> imagery as well to (hopefully) avoid mapping outdated roads and features. >> _______________________________________________ >> talk-ph mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph >> > -- > > /Erwin Olario > > e: [email protected] | v/m: https://t.me/GOwin | s: > https://mstdn.io/@GOwin > _______________________________________________ > talk-ph mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph >
_______________________________________________ talk-ph mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
