Hi Glen. >From what I've seen the Maxar layers are often better than what was available from DigitalGlobe. Of course, this may vary a lot from place to place, so it might not be true in your case. Could your case be an issue of bad imagery alignment from Maxar?
If you don't mind sharing your the location of the area you're interested in, could you? I'm curious about how they look like. Anyway,It might be worthwhile to check the Mapbox layer, too. Or the more updated Maxar Premium. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - » email: erwin@ <[email protected]>*n**gnu**it**y**.xyz* <http://ngnuity.net/> | [email protected] » mobile: https://t.me/GOwin » OpenPGP key: 3A93D56B | 5D42 7CCB 8827 9046 1ACB 0B94 63A4 81CE 3A93 D56B On Sat, Jul 6, 2019 at 8:11 AM Glen Scott <[email protected]> wrote: > Sorry guys, I've been busy and not paying any attention to OSM of late, > but just has a look and see Digitalglobe layers have been replaced by Maxar > (I'm using iD). Google tells me Maxar bought Digitalglobe some time back. > I'm now seeing water where I stood in a car park in early 2018, and where > Digitalglobe was showing a car park. A few of my buildings are now in the > sea. I think the Maxar imagery is maybe 4 years older than Digitalglobe. > > Any tricks to see the newer imagery (that we had)? Or just hard luck? > Sorry if this has been discussed before... > > Cheers > > Glen > _______________________________________________ > talk-ph mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph >
_______________________________________________ talk-ph mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
