On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 12:26:40AM +0000, Thomas Wood wrote: > I believe that some of your suggestions for tags seem to be > superfluous to the way that some of the data will be structured. > I'm also all for keeping the tags as close to the standard OSM tagging > scheme as possible, for example, using alt_name rather than > naptan:alt_name. Do we really need "consistency on data origin"?
I suggested in IRC that it may be worth keeping naptan:* tags that seemingly duplicate existing tags. name=* may not necessarily be the same as the NaPTAN name, just as the local name for something may not be the same as name=*. I didn’t think of any examples. Simon -- A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that works.—John Gall
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Talk-transit mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
