On 1 Apr 2009, at 10:38, Peter J Stoner wrote: > In message <!&!AAAAAAAAAAAuAAAAAAAAAOKaD4mR3JBOrEpRon92nMgBANp/H2q5kHF > ivkmsnziqazaaaaabxjaaabaaaadev+w8ijfnqr6pnniwup8baqaaa...@googlemail.com > > > "Andy Robinson \(blackadder-lists\)" > <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> We should note that this import is getting attention from >>> professionals and >>> that in the UK/ Transmodel because it is seen as 'The' essential >>> link >>> between the timetables and the physical world and they have seen and >>> discussed a lot of unusual situations that need to be >>> accommodated in the >>> past 10 years. I would suggest therefore that we see if we can >>> accommodate >>> their requirements. > >> I'm all ears, but my view is that the model needs to match the >> practice; >> regardless of what someone previously thought was a good idea. > > The professionals don't need to be held in too much awe, rarely do > they discuss bus stops in as much detail as OSM.
Today I have noticed that bearing in Bristol are very dodgy. Previously I noticed that indicators in Tyneside contained bearings rather than the proper content In Norfolk the authority is not using 'opp' and 'adj' in association with the cross-street. I have added these comments to the 'Local_schemes' page although they are not really local schemes as such and are likely to become more standard over time. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NaPTAN/Local_schemes Regards, Peter > > > > > -- > Peter J Stoner > UK Regional Coordinator > Traveline www.travelinedata.org.uk > > a trading name of > Intelligent Travel Solutions Ltd company number 3826797 > Drury House, 34-43 Russell Street, LONDON WC2B 5HA > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-transit mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit _______________________________________________ Talk-transit mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
