2009/7/22 Thomas Wood <[email protected]>: > 2009/7/22 Peter Miller <[email protected]>: >> >> On 20 Jul 2009, at 14:35, Thomas Wood wrote: >> >>> 2009/7/20 Peter J Stoner <[email protected]>: >>>> >>>> In message on 20 Jul 2009, Ed Loach wrote: >>>> >>>>> I'm assuming that the naptan import when it happens will be as at a >>>>> certain point in time, and won't include any new bus stops since that >>>>> time? >>>> >>>>> I'm asking because a bus route has changed in the last week or so that >>>>> now passes my house both ways instead of just one way and rather than >>>>> add bus stops on the other side of the road they've added a taped >>>>> message "Buses stop here and opposite" to each of the existing bus >>>>> stops on the road. >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> Ed >>>> >>>> >>>> If the Transport authority has done its job properly then we will >>>> expect to see Custom and Practice stops appear in NaPTAN opposite the >> >> snip >> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> The refreshed data is yet to be downloaded, so depending on the >>> responsiveness of the LA, the stops may be in there by the time I get >>> around to finalising the import. >> >> >> I am conscious that it is now over 6 months since the data was offered. I do >> realise that a lot of technical work and familiarisation has been taking >> place but it would be great to be able to complete the import and move on. >> >> I am also aware that there is a 50K place gazetteer sitting there untouched >> - last week I was adding villages in Norfolk by hand and the data is sitting >> available in NPTG. > > It is, we need to start thinking about what we can do with it. > >> Do you need help with the NaPTAN import or are you just about ready to do >> the work? Do we need to set up a wiki page where people can request imports >> for their authority or are we going to do it without that? >> > > I've been putting off working on it for a while as slightly more > interesting projects seem to keep coming my way. > Anyway, I'm now checking that the new tools that will be used to > upload the data that have been written for 0.6 will meet our needs. > For this I'm doing a few uploads to a dev server to see what the > imported data looks like with regards the created changesets etc. > I'm probably going to have to modify the uploader to record object ids > that are being stored for missing references to stop areas.
I have just done a fairly thorough review of both the 0.6 API bulk upload scripts. Neither works fully as expected. I have three options, fix the python one, finish the php one, or port the 0.5 perl one... The first option is currently looking most tempting. -- Regards, Thomas Wood (Edgemaster) _______________________________________________ Talk-transit mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
