2009/8/1 Christoph Böhme <[email protected]>: > Thomas Wood <[email protected]> schrieb: > >> I think all outstanding coding issues have now been dealt with. >> There's one minor tagging issue to address - should the source tag be >> on the data or changesets. > > Since the source tag applies to the whole changeset it makes sense to > tag only the changeset. However, I believe editors do not display > changeset tags at the moment. This means changeset tags are basically > not visible when you edit data. While it can be handy to see the source > of an element when you edit it (e.g. I'm much less relucant to move > NPE-sourced data if it does not fit with my tracks than surveyed data) > this should not be a problem with the naptan-import. The naptan:-tags > are a very obvious hint where the data is coming from. > > So, I'd vote for placing the source-tag at the changeset. > >> Otherwise, a test upload of the Surrey data is visible here - >> http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/394 >> Comments welcomed. > > Could it be that the tags are missing? All the nodes I have looked at > are empty (http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/416977, for > example)
Ooops, I linked the wrong changeset! http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/389 was my intent. > >> We're then ready to begin uploading to the main database. > > Cool :-) > > Cheers, > Christoph > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-transit mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit > -- Regards, Thomas Wood (Edgemaster) _______________________________________________ Talk-transit mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
