On Monday 10 August 2009 09:10:15 Jochen Topf wrote: > The "infrastructure route" is something different from the "moving vehicles > forming a route". They are two different concepts, so they deserve their > own keys. A bicycle route or walking route is more like an "infrastructure > route", there are signs on the way. Its a physically existing thing. The > "moving vehicle route" (which we called a line) is more "ephemeral".
To me signs have nothing to do with infrastructure. For me the infrastructure are the roads themselves. So to me a cycleroute is a moving vehicle route. >From this follows that introducing "line" relations is not consistent at all, because then we have a different type of relation for public transport moving vehicle routes and private transport moving vehicle routes. -- m.v.g., Cartinus _______________________________________________ Talk-transit mailing list Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
