Bryce McKinlay wrote: > Recently I noticed a cluster of London bus stops from NapTAN which > were missing indicator/stop_ref fields. I'm sure there are many more > of these. I'm wondering about the best practice when making > corrections or adding missing data which will ensure that these > changes can be noticed by NapTAN folks and corrected upstream? > > What I have done for now is added the missing "stop_ref" field, but > not changed any of the naptan fields. Is this enough to get a change > noticed, or should "corrected" nodes from NapTAN be tagged in some > other way? Obviously it would be better to have some sort of > automation here rather than having to send email notifications to this > list or elsewhere when a change is made.
In East Yorkshire's data we add a note=* with any missing or anomalous data. AndrewArm extracts this data and when the county's stops have all been checked we will send this data to the Transport Team in the local council so they can update NaPTAN. Maybe you could try contacting the local authority responsible for the stops and ask them if they want your findings. Cheers, Chris _______________________________________________ Talk-transit mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
