On 24/03/2010 08:57, Tom Chance wrote: > That makes sense. So if a bus stop has one or more relations added, should > it be counted as equivalent to a route_ref tag in the colour scheme, i.e. > not marked as needing a route_ref tag?
Yes, that would be good. However, this would require a bit of work since Novam is not aware of relations at all at the moment. If someone wants to start working on this the source code is available on [1]. Best, Christoph [1] https://kofje.de/repos/naptan/novam/branches/xapi-backend/ > You could also check if there are relations matching up to route_ref entries > for areas where they were put in. > > Tom > > > On 24 March 2010 08:13, Shaun McDonald <[email protected]> wrote: > >> The route ref is an interim data level until the relations are added. Think >> of it as house numbers being initially added as points, and then full >> building outlines being added at a later stage at which point the building >> number gets transferred to the building outline. >> >> Shaun >> >> On 24 Mar 2010, at 07:58, Tom Chance wrote: >> >> That all sounds good, though if we add stops to route relations do they >> really need route_ref? >> >> Tom >> >> On Mar 23, 2010 10:26 PM, "Christoph Böhme" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Tom Chance <[email protected]> schrieb: >> >>> On 23 March 2010 13:20, Christoph Boehme <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>> Well, I just updated t... >> Yes, exactly. My current plan is to have four types of stops in the >> basic scheme: >> >> 1. Non-NaPTAN stops: Stops without naptan:*-tags. Basically plain >> old OSM bus stops. >> 2. Unverified NaPTAN stops: Stops from the NaPTAN import which >> have a naptan:verified=no tag or which are missing the >> highway=bus_stop tag. >> 3. Verified NaPTAN stops: Stops tagged as hightway=bus_stop and with >> either no naptan:verified tag or a naptan:verified=yes tag. >> 4. CUS-stops: Stops with naptan:BusStopType=CUS because they are not >> marked on the ground and cannot be verified. >> >> Extended schemes would be: >> >> 1. Stops with notes: Highlight stops with a note or naptan:error tag >> 2. Route information: Highlight stops which are missing the route_ref >> tag. >> 3. Shelter and asset refs: Highlight bus stops which have shelter=yes >> and no asset_ref or which have no shelter tag at all (this might be >> quite Birmingham specific). >> 4. Anything else? >> >> I suggest to keep the old schemes but rename them to the name of the >> public transport network they apply to (e.g. "Transport West Midlands" >> for Birmingham), since they are based on the amount of information that >> is available on the signs used by a particular network. >> >> Best, >> Christoph >> >>> Best, > Tom > > -- > http://tom.acrewoods.net >> http://twitter.com/tom_chance >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-GB mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb >> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ Talk-transit mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
