On 01/26/2011 08:40 PM, Michał Borsuk wrote:

> Line 10 Winterthur:
> line# relation# # of runs
> 10 407 6
> 10 408 1
> 10 409 1
> 10 410 6
> 10 411 3
> 10 412 3
> 10 413 6
> 10 414 3
> 10 415 3
> 10 416 1
> 10 417 6
> 10 418 3
> 10 419 1
> 10 420 3
> 10 702 2
> 10 703 2
>
> Voila, one line, 16 relations (unless routes 702 and 703 are yet
> another
> "line 10" in another place). I wonder how many follow the same trace.

The bus service number 10 in Wintherthur is the most simple case you can have. Absolutely no exceptions. See timetables of the two terminal stations:
http://online.fahrplaninfo.zvv.ch/showpdf.php?pdf=pdf/21/ah_21110a/ah_21110a_j11_a_02929.pdf
http://online.fahrplaninfo.zvv.ch/showpdf.php?pdf=pdf/21/ah_21110a/ah_21110a_j11_b_01826.pdf

This gives exactly two relations.

And the list you have created does not match bus line 10 in Winterthur at all. Not even the total number of runs is correct...

Line 10 Zürich:
line# relation# # of runs
10 120 56
10 121 12
10 122 12
10 123 1
10 124 50
10 125 6
10 126 1

Interesting! And where do they start and end?

Here your "Y line" has 7 relations. Again, perhaps they follow the same
path, but my general point is to show the level of complication of the
data.

You can make everything as complicate as you want. It is your choice. But it is not necessary.

And again: Why can't you accept, that others want to map something more in detail then you do?

Teddych

_______________________________________________
Talk-transit mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit

Reply via email to