Hi,
I think there are two advantages if you use segments from one to the next step
only.
The first is you can use the segements later for routes that don´t fit in the
hole segment.
If the bus run form A to D and than to F instead of E. Now you have two
segments for almost the same way between A and D or you change all routes
using the segment A to E.
And the secound one is that you can find the exakt stop position as start or
end of a segment without any further tags for this points.
And last but not least I think this shema would better fit into other standards
like GTFS or HAFAS and so on.
regards Jan
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: "Jo" [[email protected]]
Gesendet: Do. 26.12.2013 17:04
An: "Public transport/transit/shared taxi related topics"
[[email protected]]
Betreff: Re: [Talk-transit] a little idea for new public transport shema
Since I'm the one who proposed this initially, I'm going to add some more
detail.
Stops on opposing sides of a street are hardly ever, exactly opposite one
another, so usually there are 2 stop_positions. This means there will usually
be pairs of route_segment relations, one for each direction.
For stops near a crossing, where some bus lines go to the right, others
straight on and others to the left, the (high)way up to the crossing can become
member of up to 6 relations. But that's still better than to have them as
members of all route relations and their variations for a line.
Having a route_segment for each sequence of highways between two stops, is a
possibility, but there I don't see a reason why a segment couldn't describe how
the bus goes from A to E passing B, C and D.
Unfortunately, one of the advantages of the Oxomoa scheme (being able to
oversee immediately that a route is continuous in the relation editor) would be
lost with the use of subrelations. This can be fixed, given support is
programmed for it in the relation editor (thinking mostly of JOSM here).
The biggest advantage is that now it's the route_segments wich become broken
instead of. It's a lot easier to fix those segments once instead of fixing tens
of route relations which would otherwise be present on those highways.
Lastly I want to add that in some cases (around bus stations which are mapped
in full detail for example), there would still be a need to add (high)ways to
the route relations themselves in some cases.Polyglot
2013/12/26 <[email protected]>
Hi,
i have read some mails about problems with too much relations for public
transport lines.
Also I see a problem with stoppoints and platforms specaly by bus and tram
lines.
And maintain with other Data maybe not very easy esp. GTFS data.
In most systems I know there are stored segemts between two stops and these
segments together are a lineroute.
These segemnts, I think, have some advantages:
- only one relation for each direction on the between most stops
- no need for stoppoints because the relation starts and ends at a stoppoint
near the platform
- easy to ad new lines because the can use existing segments
- most flexibility because small segments ( this may be a disadvantage too
because it need much work at the start)
regards Jan
---
Alle Postfächer an einem Ort. Jetzt wechseln und E-Mail-Adresse mitnehmen!
Rundum glücklich mit freenetMail
_______________________________________________
Talk-transit mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht Ende-----
---
Alle Postfächer an einem Ort. Jetzt wechseln und E-Mail-Adresse mitnehmen!
Rundum glücklich mit freenetMail
_______________________________________________
Talk-transit mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
