I don't think we need a new tag. There would be a lot of gray area, where
do coaches end and buses start? The line isn't clear.
What would help is we should map the operator tag and then the renderers
should show the route or not based on the operator. Or different operators
could be rendered with different colors.

I think this is more a render problem than a mapping problem.

Janko


2014-05-25 0:30 GMT+02:00 Teemu Ikonen <[email protected]>:

> Hi,
>
> The current public transport schema bundles local bus transit routes
> together with intercity buses (coaches), both routes are tagged with
> route=bus.
>
> Since buses and coaches rarely are part of the same network, this
> makes things rather confusing for users of transit maps like
> Öpnvkarte. If I want to go to another part of town, I'll need the
> routes of the local (bus) transit network and intercity services are
> distraction, but if I'm going to another city, the opposite is true.
>
> Looking at main bus stations in European cities, one sees that not
> many intercity routes are mapped. Given the current potential for
> confusion with local transit, this is probably a good thing, but it
> also means that OSM is missing a significant part of the public
> transport network.
>
> The obvious fix would be to create a new public transport type in
> addition to bus, train, tram, etc. Since British English seems to be
> the standard in OSM, the new type should be called 'coach'.
>
> In practice, this type would be used in public_transport=stop_position
> nodes with a coach=yes tag and in routes with route=coach. Coach
> routes should have tags similar to bus routes (name, network, etc.).
> Transit maps should render coach routes with a unique color to
> distinguish them from other networks.
>
> Are there any downsides to this idea? How would one go about proposing
> coach routes as a standard, documented feature? Should a new proposal
> be made, or can the active public transport proposal at
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Public_Transport
> be amended?
>
> Best,
> Teemu
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-transit mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
>
_______________________________________________
Talk-transit mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit

Reply via email to