Have not looked at the edits, but the changeset comment: "Remove place tags on administrative boundaries in Massachussets, remove admin_center/seat members that pointed to town/city halls, rename admin_center members that pointed to places to be label members instead"
...sounds like a correct edit Likely the user is correcting issues identified by the boundary validator tool that I've been running since January 2024: Discussion: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/announcing-us-boundary-tagging-qa-checker/107744 Tool: https://zelonewolf.github.io/wikidata-qa/ That tool should be producing findings that are consistent with US community consensus based on the discussion there and in other community discussions. If not, please open a ticket so I can make fixes: https://github.com/ZeLonewolf/wikidata-qa On Fri, Aug 15, 2025 at 1:42 PM Greg Troxel <[email protected]> wrote: > I noticed this while zooming in to Lancaster, and seeing that the > relation seems to point to South Lancaster (a named place) as the > center. That's argubaly reasonable, and I wonder if it was the > judgement of a local. I also wonder if this edit, which looks large > enough to fall under the mechanical edit policy, was discussed. I don't > remember seeing it here. > > https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168002357#map=9/42.147/-71.884 > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-us-massachusetts mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us-massachusetts >
_______________________________________________ Talk-us-massachusetts mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us-massachusetts
