I guess the 2007 shapefile release is supposed to incorporate the first of 
their Accuracy Improvement Project results.  Would be nice to have some sort of 
automated setup that could incorporate these improvements in streets that are 
unmodified since the last release, and then could allow a user to compare the 
new street alignment or data against streets or areas that have changed since 
the last update.  It would be a shame to be unable to take advantage of the 
governments ongoing work to improve accuracy and add new information, but the 
correlation issues seem daunting.
At least we're not in the UK where you already paid for the survey through your 
taxes, but still have to license the data.
    -Mike

-- "Dylan Semler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 4:10 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Apparently, the US Census folks made an updated data release from their TIGER 
database on 31 March 2007.

http://www.census.gov/geo/www/tiger/tgrshp2007/tgrshp2007.html

Apparently it is in a new data format (shapefiles) than the 2006 and previous 
releases.  I'm a total newbie to how the OSM project is planning to proceed, so 
this raised a few questions in my mind...

Is the Census Bureau going to continue to make regular (ie. annual or 
semi-annual) data releases of street centerline data, or does the 2007 
TIGER/Line Shapefile release represent the end of the project?

If they plan on releasing incremental updates, is there an OSM plan in place 
for pulling from their updated information each time they release? or was the 
2006 data intended to be a baseline that would then be improved and maintained 
only by OSM users?

If the census bureau continues to release updated information, and OSM intends 
to import the data refinements into the project, how does that work with user 
edits that have been made between data releases/imports?


I've wondered this too.  It certainly would be nice not to have to duplicate 
efforts if we don't have too.  I'm also curious about whether or not any of the 
"MAF/TIGER Accuracy Improvement Project" results have been applied to the 2006 
data that we imported.  Perhaps with some of the new shapefile -> osm tools 
that are being developed one can compare the two data sets for a small area and 
see if there's much of a difference.

-- 
Type faster. Use Dvorak:
http://dvzine.org 
____________________________________________________________
Click here for great travel deals to beautiful London!
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2131/fc/Ioyw6iifkHaY1d2LHt5xMqmcKrYorKP98fI0rFiFy0dBEpmddbQlxI/
_______________________________________________
Talk-us mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk-us

Reply via email to