On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 09:57:34AM -0500, Ian Dees wrote: > On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 9:51 AM, Doug Morrison-Cleary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > > Nooooooo. I live in northern MN and all we have around here are lakes! > > I really want them in yesterday <grin>. Please :-) > > > Ok I suppose I should have been more explicit. The lakes and river areas > seem to be the easiest to tag in OSM. They are bodies of water. The sticky > parts are the marshes and canals/drainage ditches. > > Perhaps we could just start an import with tags that make sense for these > things (e.g. natural=marsh). Either that or we only import the FCode/FTypes > that have an obvious OSM tagging scheme right now and import the other stuff > later.
Here's a draft of what I've got so far: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/User:Davetoo/NHD/FCODES Might not be the best format, but gives you an idea of what I've found so far. I think we need to be careful about the flowlines and in particular the artificial paths; I'm not yet convinced that any of the flowlines should be depicted on the map. _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
