Probably a lot more involved, but a custom warnings option that is editable would probably provide a LOT more useful for everyone. Perhaps put the tiger tag in as a default sample?
Dale On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 4:21 PM, Ian Dees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 1:50 PM, Patrick Kilian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I just implemented a new maplint test to check for tiger:reviewed=no >> tags. Currently it would generate notices (shown in yellow) because lots >> of objects are going to be highlighted by this test and I don't want to >> obscure other warnings. The new test can be seen at >> http://www.petschge.de/osm/maplint/maplint-tiger.patch and is not in the >> svn yet. Are there any good reasons not to commit that test? > > > There will be a *lot* of ways with reviewed=no. Almost all, in fact. I > would rather see maplint show me the ways that are reviewed=yes. > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-us mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us > > -- Dale Puch
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
