Chris, Thanks for putting up that table. Looks great. I have two suggestions:
I think the network identifiers should be simpler. What about this scheme? Interstate = Interstate signed highway system US = US signed highway system [state abbr.] = State signed highway system TX = Texas CA = California OR = Oregon etc... County or other networks should just be the county name or TN Secondary, etc... To avoid duplicate network values (CA stands for California and Canada) we can use the "is_in" key the same way it is used for place names. So a California route relation would have these tags: network: CA is_in: United States Or a county road system in california: network: Marin Co is_in: California, United States This way we don't clutter up the network name, but we keep the differentiating information. My other suggestion is that I don't thing the symbol key is necessary. I think the renderers should be able to assign a symbol based on the network and is_in tags once they get to that stage. This way they symbols will stay more consistent and we won't get US highway shields that look slightly different throughout the country. Thoughts? Zeke
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us