Russ Nelson wrote: > David Carmean writes: > > The choice of "path" or "track" has been a little imprecise. > > I draw the line at "track == something a car *could* use", "path == > not wide enough for vehicular use". >
Not to split hairs, but most jurisdictions consider bicycles vehicles, just not motorized ones.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
