On Sun, 2009-04-12 at 13:23 -0500, Joseph Jon Booker wrote: > On Sun, 12 Apr 2009 08:39:45 -0700 > Apollinaris Schoell <ascho...@gmail.com> wrote: > > 2 relations are easier. adding role to thousands of members is a > > pain. and we need to split relations with API 0.6 anyway > > So how do we handle the case where a US route is cosigned with an > interstate? > > 1. add both motorways to new route relations that signify the direction > of the original US route, and have no relation between those relations > and the original US route? > 2. Have both ways part of the original US route, with no direction > information? > 3. Same as number one, but have the new us routes added to a > "super-relation" for the original US route
One relation for the Interstate. One relation for the US Route. They each have ways (or sub-relations) for members. Where they are cosigned, the ways or sub-relations are members of both relations. _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
