Paul Johnson wrote: > Frederik Ramm wrote: > >> Mario Salvini wrote: >> >>> Even in germany on these roads there are no additional rights-of-way in >>> comparison to "normal" cycleways (except that bicycles get the >>> officially allowance to drive next to each other and not just inline. >>> buts that's piece of cake ;) ). A normal cycleway with >>> motorcar/agricultural/...=yes/destination/... would be exactly the same. >>> >> We're getting very much into national detail here but just to give an >> example, look at this aerial image (which is 100 metres from my office BTW): >> >> http://maps.google.de/maps?ll=49.007912,8.378746&spn=0.000729,0.001026&t=h&z=20 >> >> The road going east-west is a former residential road with different >> lanes for each direction of travel, plus diagonal parking spaces in the >> middle. It is over 20 metres wide. This road has now been designated a >> "Fahrradstrasse" (cycle road). Motorized traffic is still allowed at >> "adequate speeds" (whatever that means). >> While I am not a big fan of endless tagging discussions, tagging the >> road above as "highway=cycleway, car=yes" strikes me as grossly misleading. >> >> Maybe it should simply retain highway=residential. After all, the >> "residentialness" of the road has not changed one bit since it was >> designated a cycle road. >> > > On the other hand, it's no longer as minor as a residential road, nor > has the same use as a residential road (as it's throughbound for cyclists). > highway=residential and bicycle=designated ?
If it's not a through road for vehicles but is for bicycles that could be a challenge to tag access restrictions on. Perhaps a node with barrier=* if there is one. _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
