Does boundary=national_park have nothing to do with US National Parks? I.e. it's just a park at the national level?
Andy Tyler wrote: > Just tagging the underlying landtypes and uses is fine (aside from most > of them not being natural) but doesn't at all account for the difference > between scrubland/seashore/whatever where you will be shot to death if > you trespass (military installations) and that which you're free to roam > around on and is designated a park. > > > Then use the boundary key. If you way up each of the unique > sections, then create a multipolygon relation out of all of the > boundary ways and additional multipolygons for each of the various > landuses or ground covers. > > > Boundaries are a good solution, and are easy for the national lands set > aside for recreation boundary=national_park covers them nicely (and > renderers could easily decide to render them as filled green > areas--standard practice). > > Through a quick discussion on #osm I'm going with boundary=national_park > (for all parks that aren't urban parks), admin_level="whatever the > operator level is", operator="whoever the operator is" and > ownership="whoever the owner is" parsing that out to re-tag it > consistently later should be relatively trivial. > > Thanks for the discussion Adam, > > -Tyler > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-us mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us -- Andy PGP Key ID: 0xDC1B5864 _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
