Hi, Greg Troxel wrote: >> Heve had a look through some of the listing in Texas (2800 would take >> a LONG time...). Here's where a minor concern pops up. So far I'm >> through Midland County. The majority of the rural counties changes >> look to be correct fixes. The majority of larger city changes are >> downgrading the links, when in fact the highway itself needs to be >> upgraded. > > If the highway is tagged trunk but ought to be a motorway, then > auto-changing the links to trunk_link still seems like progress. > > Quick, fix the highway before the script runs :-)
If the automatic edit goes ahead, then it will downgrade all motorway links as listed on the web page I provided, unless they have been modified in the mean time. This means that upgrading a trunk to motorway now would not save the links from being downgraded! Now if people are doing this en masse over the next few days then I would have to decide on an automatism for detecting these cases, or re-run the analysis. But if these are isolated cases, then I would like to offer the following suggestion: If you upgrade a road to motorway, could you also remove the "tiger:reviewed=no" tag from the associated motorway_links? That would then flag them as modified, and cause my script not to downgrade them. Bye Frederik -- Frederik Ramm ## eMail [email protected] ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33" _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
