On Sun, 2009-10-04 at 02:24 +1000, John Smith wrote: > 2009/10/4 Dave Hansen <d...@sr71.net>: > > Is this the most up to date way of keeping addresses? > > > > > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/House_numbers/Karlsruhe_Schema > > > > Well, I have some perl code that will parse the 2007/2008 TIGER data > > files. My goal is to get the addresses imported into OSM this time > > around. Here's some ugly sample output of what I have now. > > > > http://sr71.net/~dave/osm/tiger/sherman.osm > > > > I don't need any suggestions on it, I just wanted to show people what I > > have so far. > > > > Issues: > > * I currently have the way combination code turned off. This means that > > OSM ways are represented 1:1 with the TIGER TLIDs. > > * Some multi-segment TIGER roads have only a single address range. > > Do we create segments for each road segment and evenly divide the > > addresses? Or, do we draw a single address segment going from the > > first to last node? > > > > And, yes, I saw the 2009 data come out. I'll make sure my code works > > with it. > > Wouldn't these questions be better going to the import mailing list?
There's an imports list? ;) -- Dave _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
