Anthony wrote: > On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Dave Hansen <[email protected]> wrote: >> So, what I did initially was go and contact all of the mappers in the US >> that I could find. I asked them all individually what should be done in >> their local areas and I believe I was able to follow their wishes >> without failure. > > Are you planning to do the same with the TIGER address import? > >> If you want to do the same with TIGER removal, I'd >> welcome it, especially if you have something superior to contribute. On >> a small or large scale, we should *NEVER* keep any data in the map just >> because it is what was already there. > > Yeah, most of the TIGER import isn't that hard to remove (an exception > would be those CDPs, which I'd have probably removed by now if it were > simple, since they're completely out of touch with reality). If you > don't like it, just remove it right before you add something better.
The other thing is there's at least one person who gets bothered if TIGER data is touched, as I discovered re-drawing I405 in Oregon while it was closed for repave... _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
