On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Ian Dees <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 8:19 AM, [email protected] > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Instead of importing lots of data, I have imported only one lake for >> your review and approval. >> >> I have documented it here : >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/h4ck3rm1k3/diary/8927 >> >> Water files, Bull Shoals Lake, Norfork lake >> >> I have been looking for the shape files for the Bull Shoals Lake, and >> Norfork lake in Arkansas. >> >> http://water.usgs.gov/GIS/dsdl/ds240/index.html >> >> It is mentioned here : >> http://msdis.missouri.edu/datasearch/metadata/utm/st_lake_cls_use.xml >> "The following water bodies were included in the NHD and staff edited >> the polygons with GIS software to more accurately depict the water >> body. >> " > > The current NHD either includes these updates or is higher quality than this > historical stuff that the USGS has. I would recommend working on importing > the NHD rather than other datasets.
Any links? I have not seen that yet. This is pretty detailed, the data that I found. > > Also, lakes should not have a natural=coastline tag, they should be tagged > natural=water. Yes, we got it now. the Relationship is water, the coast parts are coastline. eg : http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/361097 thanks all for your help. mike _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
