On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Anthony <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 7:39 PM, Dale Puch <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Is it just a (very wide) road above? (layer 0) The road above would be >> Bridge=yes layer=1 >> Is it building or park above (with or without roads)? Tunnel=yes layer=-1 >> and the stuff above would be layer 0 >> > > I'm not sure which is in the picture, but the one with Chestnut Street is > interesting. > http://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?lat=39.947699&lon=-75.141691&zoom=18&layers=B000FTF > > If you're going to put I-95 at layer=-1 (which I suppose you have to do due > to the park), then I think Chestnut Street is a good candidate for layer=0 > and bridge=yes. Then I guess you'd have to split Chestnut Street before it > crosses Columbus and make it bridge=yes layer=1. > > Alternatively, I guess you could make the whole thing bridge=yes and > layer=1. I don't really like either solution though. Putting layer tags on > ways seems inadequate to handle this. >
Why make it a bridge at all. It is layer 0... If you have a tunnel (I-95) you do not need a bridge to cross it. -- Dale Puch
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
