On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Paul Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Mar 2010 09:40:47 -0500, Anthony wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Anthony > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> The important, worldwide criteria that I'd expect is this: *Motorways > >> are exclusive to motor vehicle traffic. *trunks are the most important > >> roads in a geographic area which aren't motorways. > >> > >> > > As a corollary to this, Alaska should have several motorway and/or trunk > > roads, regardless of whether or not they are interstates, fake > > interstates, paved, unpaved, divided, undivided, etc. > > That would violate the basic definition of the word "motorway" as it is > commonly understood in the English language. > http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/motorway > How so? I said "motorway and/or trunk roads". Any roads which don't qualify as motorways would be trunks.
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
