On 5 August 2010 20:27, Ian Dees <ian.d...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 8, 2000 at 3:20 PM, Katie Filbert <filbe...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> The difference with NHD is that we are leaving conversion to osm format >> for the local mapper / importer. Since OSM US has server space, maybe >> that's good use of it to host converted data ready for import. >> > > I like this... the NHD status page on the wiki sort of already does this in > a backwards way. Perhaps I will look in to writing a web tool to keep track > of the import and give easy access to the pre-generated OSM files for > subbasins. > > I think keeping the data in a database and generating on the fly with a more advanced interface like (http://clc.openstreetmap.fr) would be very good. I have been meaning to implement a webservice which would generate OSM file with specific functionalities based on some kind of layer and requests to power a site like the one shown previously.
Emilie Laffray
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
