Dear talk-us list,
we - the Data Working Group - have an issue that we hope you can
help us resolve.
There is one person in the US community - Paul Johnson a.k.a. baloo -
who is rather creative with his tagging. It seems to us that Paul has,
in the past, used the mere existence of a cycle route to tag neighboring
residential roads as "bicycle=destination" which probably stretches the
meaning of the concept, and might, if there is indeed a local law saying
you must use cycle routes, even be redundant. Recently, Paul has also
started tagging some highways as bicycle=avoid on the grounds of them
being large and there not being a cycleway - again something that other
mappers might consider unnecessary.
While this might be considered slightly eccentric tagging by some, it
can hardly be considered harmful, and Paul seems to restrict this
tagging to his local area. In OSM, we're usually happy if someone cares
for their area, and we certainly allow them some liberties in shaping
OSM for their area.
There is another person in the US community - Nathan Edgars II a.k.a.
NE2 - who seems to have made it a mission to fight the kind of slightly
eccentric tagging that Paul uses. While Nathan is most active in his
local area, every now and then he reverts large parts of Paul's work,
2,500 miles away, claiming, in is changeset comments, that he was
"removing bogus tags".
We have tried to calm down both parties by suggesting to Paul that he
stick to tagging that is clearly verifiable and offer proof where
challenged; and by asking Nathan to consider sticking to his local area
instead of feeling responsible for "fixing" tags on the other side of
the country.
But ultimately, this is a conflict between two individuals and their
idea of how OSM should work. The Data Working Group has been dragged
into this by multiple complaints, and in principle conflict mediation
does fall within its remit but we feel that issues such as this should
be debated on the lists, and that the community should reach a consensus
on how to deal with such situations. If there is community consensus,
the Data Working Group will certainly help enforce it, but we don't feel
that we should be the judge and jury in this.
If we should continue to receive more complaints from or about the
individuals named in this posting, we will respond by banning both
accounts until they cool down.
Thank you
Frederik Ramm
for the Data Working Group
_______________________________________________
Talk-us mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
