On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Alex Mauer <ha...@hawkesnest.net> wrote: > On 10/18/2010 04:54 PM, Anthony wrote: >> First of all, the ref tags aren't valid. The numbers are references >> of *routes*, not of *ways*. [snip] > You could equally say “the name tags aren’t valid; the names are references > of *streets*, not of *ways*”.
I could, and I have, actually. > So just like applying a name= tag to a way to say “this way is part of the > street named foo”, we must apply a ref= tag to a way to say “this way is > part of the route with reference foo” in order to get it to show up on the > map. It’s what we’ve got for now; until we have something better we have to > live with it. In terms of routes, we do have something better. Route relations. There are also street relations, but so far they are only proposed. > Fix the renderers first. Don't tag for the renderer. _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
