On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Nathan Edgars II <[email protected]>wrote:

> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 6:00 PM, Ian Dees <[email protected]> wrote:
> > - Support for route relations
>
> Why should this be US-specific? Canada certainly has the same sort of
> route system as the US, and many European countries have signed
> overlaps, at least of E-routes and nationally-numbered routes.
>

I think I've mentioned in this thread that osm2pgsql already creates
geometries from route relations so when I said "Support for route relations"
I meant "Add Mapnik rules so that route relations are rendered."
_______________________________________________
Talk-us mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Reply via email to