On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Paul Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 10/23/2010 10:39 AM, Ian Dees wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 10:31 AM, Nathan Edgars II <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Phil! Gold > > <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > Do you know whether other states have > > > similar official standards for such things (and whether they're > > publically > > > available)? > > > > Some states may, while others don't seem to have a single standard > > abbreviation. > > > > > > Prefix information should not go in OSM. If a renderer wants to display > > a prefix somehow, then they can go look it up based on other information > > given in the other tags on the relation. > > That works out great. Until you have situations where two routes in > different networks have the same number intersect or run closely parallel. > > Not a problem if each route is a different relation.
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
