On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 5:23 AM, Frederik Ramm <frede...@remote.org> wrote: > Having said that - this is what he had in mind when we invented addr:*, > but of course if the wider community wants to use addr:* for different > stuff then I guess we cannot keep them from it...
It looks like the addr:state tags were just added recently in a mass edit by rickmastfan67: http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/rickmastfan67/edits So I wouldn't say this is a "wider community" thing at all. I would tend to agree that is_in would be better. Also, is there much value in adding these tags on multi-state relations? For example: addr:state=TN;KY;OH;IN on this relation: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/444136 Toby _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
