On 02/04/2011 01:42 AM, Nathan Edgars II wrote: > On 2/3/2011 11:15 PM, Paul Johnson wrote: >> underlying ways >> often have refs that belong to them (like bridge numbers) but not the >> route itself. > You've said this a number of times without explanation. Why does the > bridge number, or ODOT's internal referencing, "belong" to the way, > while the route number doesn't?
Oregon considers highway numbers and route numbers differently. >> Bike boulevards are on the same network as each other (well, the >> Portland ones, are, at any rate; note I'm not referring to official >> routes for state highways like 99 or federal highways like 205 or 84 >> since you're talking about city bike boulevards). > > Speaking of this, I don't think it's appropriate to mark the cycleways > that parallel I-84 and I-205 as ncn just because they parallel highways > on the national motor network. Never mind Oregon gets federal dollars to maintain those third roadways for those federal ways, eh?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
