On 2/12/2011 2:01 PM, Val Kartchner wrote: > That was it. I split the parking lot at the boundary of the land use, > and it now renders correctly. I'll have to keep this in mind when I'm > drawing parking. > > I figured that since there was very little separation between parking > lots that it should be done as one big one.
Oh, I didn't even notice the big area to the north. I was talking about the small commercial lot off 48th. Since the two large areas do in fact share parking with absolutely no separation, it's probably best to treat them as one parcel and use the more prominent landuse value (or should it be commercial by default, since retail is a subset of commercial?). Then you can indicate the actual uses of each building (which may be mixed; an office building might have a cafe on the first floor).
(By the way, the commercial parking to the north still goes slightly into the retail area. Maybe Mapnik calculates the area and draws from biggest to smallest?)
An area (parking lot, pedestrian, whatever) should only be one piece if it's all connected. Since you can't enter the retail parking lot and get to the small south commercial parking, they should be two separate areas, close *but not touching*.
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
