On Sun, 10 Apr 2011 20:14:18 -0400, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
It's almost like they defined super-groups of counties identified by
those letters. I'll have to crunch that table to see if that's the
case
so we could have network=US:CA:S + ref="CR S18". Maybe add an
is_in:county tag to the individual segments to avoid losing that
important info.
How about simply network=US:CA:CR?
That's all well and good for California, but what about states like
Arkansas (and Florida, IIRC) where the county road system is not unique
to the entire state. I suppose in that case, US:AR:[County] would be the
appropriate network value? US:AR:CR would be meaningless.
_______________________________________________
Talk-us mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
