On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 10:56:51AM -0400, Richard Welty wrote: > On 4/13/11 10:54 AM, Mike N wrote: > >On 4/13/2011 10:44 AM, Paul Johnson wrote: > >>>> network="US:CA:Orange" > >>>> + ref="CR S18" > >>I'd drop the CR prefix since that's more of a network identifier than a > >>reference number. > > > > > > Most Interstates, US Highways and most state highways include > >the network identifier. Why should this be dropped for the > >county roads?
> ways vs. relations. we need the identifier on ways because of the > data consumers > that expect to render directly. for relations, we should in theory > be only including > the actual reference number. Isn't that just tagging for the renderer? -- Kristian Zoerhoff [email protected] _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
