On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Richard Welty <[email protected]> wrote: > On 5/29/11 11:37 AM, Anthony wrote: >> >> On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Richard Welty<[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> in short: a routing engine will probably use classifications where >>> maxspeed >>> data is missing, but probably only to derive guesstimates of maxspeed >>> values. >> >> Now that I think about it, that's actually an excellent reason why >> classifications in the US should be by state. Max speeds vary >> significantly by state, as well as classifications of what roads get >> what speeds. >> > actually, i'd argue that it's an excellent reason to start aggressively > collecting the missing maxspeed data.
The two aren't mutually exclusive. Anyway, why argue about it? If you have a reason to start aggressively collecting data the missing maxspeed data, just do it. _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
