On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Ian Dees <[email protected]> wrote: > I took a peek at this a while back and came to the conclusion that it wasn't > as useful as tiling the seamless server because a) it has older data and b)
I'm not sure if I made myself clear. While the Tiled service sometimes has older data than the Seamless service, it sometimes has newer, better imagery that simply isn't available via Seamless. For my case, Northern Virginia, the newest Seamless imagery is from October 2008, however it is only 0.5m. The highest resolution available on Seamless is 0.5-foot, but it is from 2002. However on the Tiled service, there exists imagery from April 2007 that is 0.5-foot. Why this imagery isn't available via Seamless, I don't know. But I want to use it. > is harder to work with. Definitely! -Josh _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
