Richard wrote some parts of TIGER 2010 are no doubt excellent and worth the effort to use to improve OSM. but TIGER is erratic enough that i don't think we should hold it up as a "standard".
---------------------------- Absolutely agree. I was troubled using the word standard because of the exact reason youi give. I was looking for a word that gave the impression that TIGER 2010 has many more "newer" roads than the old TIGER, even if they are in the wrong geometry. I was thinking of saying "up to TIGER 2010 quantity" but that doesn't sound right either. I can only come up with "up to TIGER 2010 updatedness" which sound a bit wimpy to me. Cheers Nick
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
