Toby Murray wrote: > I mentioned something about cardinal direction relation roles on > IRC last night and I think it was RichardF thought they were > silly because he had no concept of a "north/south" vs "east/west" > highway.
Probably not me, but you're right, and it's not a question we have to worry about in the UK anyway - we don't need highway route relations because any road only has one number. FWIW, and you should absolutely not listen to me because I'm a long way away and it's up to you guys to sort yourselves out... but I'd create a separate relation for each direction (i.e. one northbound relation, one southbound relation) and not bother with roles at all. It's simpler conceptually, simpler for the newbie to edit, simpler to process. (If you wanted to, you could then have a super-relation for the two relations, though personally I wouldn't see the need.) cheers Richard -- View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/Relation-roles-tp6530016p6530697.html Sent from the USA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
