They appear to be descriptive names in general use within Oklohoma. Oknoname reservoirs are referenced in these, so the names are at least in use.
http://richseeley.blogspot.com/2011/04/oknoname-reservoir-tulsa-ok.html http://www.apartmentfinder.com/Oklahoma/Oklahoma-City/Summit-Parke-Neighborhood-Apartments http://www.ascog.org/downloads/Hazard%20Mitigation/Hazard%20Mitigation%20Plan%20-%20McClain%20Co%20Final.pdf http://erosioncontrol.net/july-august-2011/retaining-walls-precast.aspx http://corpslakes.usace.army.mil/employees/cecwon/pdfs/NatRecLake-06Documents.pdf On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Nathan Edgars II <nerou...@gmail.com>wrote: > The GNIS import included a number of lakes, reservoirs, and dams in > Oklahoma with name=Oknoname [number] [Reservoir|Dam], e.g. > http://www.openstreetmap.org/**browse/node/357440089/history<http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/357440089/history>. > The source cited by the GNIS is "U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Dams and > Reservoirs List, Washington, DC.". > > It's pretty obvious that these are placeholder names given to unnamed > objects. But have these names become accepted, or are they simply bogus? > > ______________________________**_________________ > Talk-us mailing list > Talk-us@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.**org/listinfo/talk-us<http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us> > -- Carl Anderson, GISP cander...@spatialfocus.com carl.ander...@vadose.org
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us