On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 12:05 AM, Paul Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, 2011-09-10 at 00:02 -0400, Anthony wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 11:55 PM, Paul Johnson <[email protected]> > wrote: >> > On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 23:25 -0400, Anthony wrote: >> >> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 7:36 PM, PJ Houser >> >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Do you think it makes more sense to tag the apartment complexes > as >> >> > access=destination or access=private? >> >> >> >> Shouldn't they generally be access=permissive? >> > >> > At least in the states I've been in, in general it seems to be in a >> > commercial setting, it would be. In residential settings, these > ways >> > tend to be closed to everyone except visitors/clients of residents >> > (couriers, plumbers, pizza delivery, garbage removal, etc) that have >> > have been invited in, and trespassing charges can be pressed against >> > everyone else. >> >> Without warning? Where in the US can you be charged with trespass >> without any warning (no sign, no fence, no marked trees, no building, >> no verbal warning)? > > It's pretty rare for those things not to exist, visibly on the aerial > imagery even (given the commonality of fences), and it not being signed > in urban areas is rare.
Ah, okay. Yeah, if there's a sign or a fence/gate, access=private is probably the way to go. _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
