On 1/3/2012 3:17 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
Those are unfortunate false negatives. We can probably not capture each and every one of those. We need to weigh them against the benefit of having a consistent naming across the US. I personally tend to accepting these false negatives. That said, I would want to discuss this more to get a better understanding of the amount of false negatives we'd be dealing with.
I also believe that a few false negatives are better than trying to continue to manually edit names. One of the considerations is whether to expand road names not based in TIGER - those may have false negatives. I have no idea how many such cases exist.
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
