On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 11:02 AM, andrzej zaborowski <[email protected]> wrote: > On 31 January 2012 18:51, Paul Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: >> Looks like about 4% of Austin was balrog-kun; I'm in the process of tagging >> that odbl=clean right now per his previous request. > > I don't believe I made any non-automatic edits in TX, and those are > already considered clean by the license plugins. > > Note also that if you use odbl=clean you need to make sure other edits > in the history are ODbL-clean and as far as I know there's no general > way to do that. >
Are they also considered clean on http://odbl.poole.ch/usa-20111208-20120201-poly.html ? There's still a whole lot of 'dirty' edits by you on there. If they're not and they should be, what can we do to have this page reflect reality better? Best, -- martijn van exel geospatial omnivore 1109 1st ave #2 salt lake city, ut 84103 801-550-5815 http://oegeo.wordpress.com _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
