* Richard Welty <[email protected]> [2012-03-11 20:59 -0400]: > On 3/11/12 11:16 AM, Phil! Gold wrote: > >I'm partial to the idea of separating the banner from the reference > >number, but I'm not sure how any of these ideas mesh with the > >understandings of people with more experience with road networks than I > >have. > > i like the idea of separating banners out too, but many current data > consumers > assume that they can just use the ref tag to label a route and be > done with it.
I'm talking only about route relations, not the ways themselves. For route relations, we already split network and ref tags, so you already can't just use the ref tag. Also, there are few, if any, data consumers using route relations (a situation I'm working on rectifying, which prompted this email). -- ...computer contrarian of the first order... / http://aperiodic.net/phil/ PGP: 026A27F2 print: D200 5BDB FC4B B24A 9248 9F7A 4322 2D22 026A 27F2 --- -- Top Ten Things Overheard At The ANSI C Draft Committee Meetings: (2) Thank you for your generous donation, Mr. Wirth. (1) Gee, I wish we hadn't backed down on 'noalias'. ---- --- -- _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
