On 3/14/2012 8:37 PM, Mike N wrote:
The tiger:reviewed=no tag usage varies with each person, but generally anything validated by a human against local knowledge or an aerial image doesn't need the tiger:reviewed tag at all.
I would disagree with this - reviewing should include verifying the street name. If you just check against aerials, especially in an area where TIGER is imprecise (hence a suburban street may be drawn in the rough location of the next one over), you could let many name errors through.
Depending on the state or local government, you may be able to verify names against an official dataset. Otherwise subdivision plats work for the endless suburban superblocks that nobody wants to survey.
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
