At 2012-02-01 06:08, Nick Hocking wrote:
Ok I've found a few more close typos

Gassen not Glassen

Correct. source=LACDPW;LACA + source_ref=PWFB1521-265;TR0044-020;ABK5456-016


Tropico not Tropica

Correct. Tropico Way in LA 90065: source=LACDPW;LACA + source_ref=TR0726-039;ABK5464-006
Tropico Ave in Whittier: source=LACDPW;LACA + source_ref=TR0518-006;ABK8228-010


Lavell not lavel

Correct. source=LACDPW;LACA + source_ref=PWFB1521-257;TR0023-102a;ABK5462-006


Pleasant View not Pleasent View

Correct. source=LACDPW;LACA + source_ref=TR0012-064;ABK5454-023


Seymour not Seymore

This one was interesting. See the notes at the bottom of the tract map for the name changes - the previous name was, in fact, Seymore. Name changes aren't always noted on these docs, so it's important to look at the dates, but it's nice when they are. source=LACDPW;LACA + source_ref=TR0016-042b;ABK5453-019


Arroyo Seco not Aroyo Seco

Correct. source=LACDPW;LACA + source_ref=TR0049-071;ABK5446-022


Parrish not Parish

It depends:

In LA 90065, Parrish Ave: source=LACDPW;LACA + source_ref=PWFB1521-257;TR0101-001;ABK5462-008 In Burbank, Parish Pl: source=LACDPW;LACA + source_ref=PWFB1718-924;TR0128-041;ABK2444-009


Shilburn not Shelburn

In LA 90065, Shelburn Ct is correct. source=LACDPW;LACA + source_ref=PWFB1422-333;TR0022-115b;ABK5451-008
Shelburne is used in two other places.



I've have not fixed the Parrish/Lavell ones since there is something
really wrong with either or both of OSM and TIGER.

I believe that this area really needs another survey.

I do have an unprocessed photo survey of the area I did in January and August 2010. Maybe if we ever get past the license change fixes...


It would be great if TIGER2011 could be in one half of
Frederik's compare tool and OSM in the other, however
putting Google in the other half allows you to easily
spot where there are potential spelling mistakes in the
OSM data.

In small areas, I've generated a unique list of names from an OSM file and then from TIGER or some county source and done a diff to identify the obvious ones. Of course, you have to re-abbreviate the OSM street types, and do various other manual things, but it's better than a visual compare.

--
Alan Mintz <[email protected]>


_______________________________________________
Talk-us mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Reply via email to