* Nathan Edgars II <nerou...@gmail.com> [2012-04-04 11:54 -0400]: > It seems that many people see the network tag as not representing a > network but a shield design. Does this sound accurate?
That matches my sense of what people have said about the tagging. I've been thinking of them in terms of subsets of a larger network, but since the subset is largely determined by how it's signed, it amounts to the same thing. * Craig Hinners <cr...@hinnerspace.com> [2012-04-04 09:14 -0700]: > One of many examples: Maryland uses a unique green-on-white shield for > US Business routes, but those roads still get tagged as > "network=US:US:Business", not "network=US:US:Business:MD" or somesuch. It seems to me that network=US:US:Business:MD is the logical extension of a scheme that has US:US and US:US:Business. I had actually planned on attaching Maryland's US Business shields to the US:US:Business:MD network once I made them, but I haven't gotten to those yet. -- ...computer contrarian of the first order... / http://aperiodic.net/phil/ PGP: 026A27F2 print: D200 5BDB FC4B B24A 9248 9F7A 4322 2D22 026A 27F2 --- -- <vees> my htaccess ban finger is twitching -- seen on #umbclinux ---- --- -- _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us