Chris Lawrence wrote: > On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Alexander Jones > <[email protected]> wrote: >> The city boundaries near San Antonio probably have to be reimported. It's >> a nightmare to work with, and I don't have the requisite multipolygon >> experience to do such a major task. > > The TX boundaries in general are a mess... it was my first attempt at > getting the city boundaries in general and it shows, alas. I'll see > what I can do (I have a busy month but I can probably at least get > started).
There are three boundary relations for Baytown. ;) >> Also, the I-10 relation in Texas is way too big (over 2000 members). I >> likely could take care of this myself, but I'd like to know where I >> should split it. > > Splitting into eastbound and westbound relations would help (and > probably needs to be done eventually for all the interstates anyway to > support directional signage in GPS apps correctly). Beyond that... > I'd guess logical split points would be: > > The I-20 split > Somewhere in San Antonio (either the north or south end of the I-35 > multiplex). I-45 in Houston Done. The way counts for the relations are as follows: Range |Eastbound|Westbound NM - I 20 | 230 | 225 I 20 - I 35| 313 | 331 I 35 - I 45| 297 | 298 I 45 - LA | 194 | 193 Perhaps the I-20 divider should be moved. Maybe to Fort Stockton? Which one should I do next? -Alexander _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
